
Care Planning as Collaboration: Moving Beyond Templates
Care Planning as Collaboration: Moving Beyond Templates
Published: Friday, 13 March 2026
Category: Practical Tools & Skills
Reading time: 7 minutes
The care plan sits in a drawer, untouched since the day it was signed. The client has never looked at it. Probably couldn't understand it if they did. It was written in service jargon, focused on what they "need to work on," structured around program outcomes, not their actual life.
And yet, somehow, we call this "person-centred planning."
Here's the uncomfortable truth: Most care plans are compliance documents masquerading as collaborative tools. They're written to satisfy funders, document risk management, and show we're doing something.
But they're not actually useful to the person whose life they're supposed to be about.
Real collaborative care planning looks completely different. It starts with the person's vision for their life, uses their words, addresses their actual priorities, and results in a document they can actually use.
Let me show you what that looks like.
What's Wrong with Traditional Care Planning
Problem 1: Worker-Driven Process
Traditional approach: Worker conducts assessment, identifies needs, determines goals, writes plan, asks client to sign.
What's wrong: The worker does the thinking. The client is passive. Their expertise about their own life is underutilised. Their ownership of the plan is minimal.
Real collaborative planning: Client leads. Worker supports, offers information, helps articulate goals—but the client is the architect of their own plan.
Problem 2: Service-Centred Goals
Traditional goals:
"Client will attend weekly counselling sessions"
"Client will participate in group program"
"Client will comply with medication regime"
What's wrong: These are about service engagement, not life outcomes. They serve the service, not the person.
Person-centred goals:
"I will feel less anxious so I can go to my daughter's school events"
"I will find people who understand what I'm going through"
"I will find ways to manage my symptoms that work for me"
See the difference? The second set is about what matters to them, in their words.
Problem 3: Jargon-Heavy and Inaccessible
Traditional language: "Client will demonstrate increased capacity for emotional regulation through utilisation of therapeutic interventions."
What's wrong: Who talks like this? The person can't understand their own plan. It's written for other professionals, not for them.
Accessible language: "I will learn ways to calm down when I'm feeling overwhelmed, and practice them with support."
If the person can't understand their plan, it's not their plan.
Problem 4: Written Once, Ignored Forever
Traditional approach: Plan is written at intake, filed away, reviewed annually (maybe), rarely referenced.
What's wrong: Life changes. Goals shift. Plans need to be living documents that adapt, not static paperwork that gathers dust.
Collaborative approach: Plans are revisited regularly, adjusted as circumstances change, actually used as a tool for ongoing work.
Problem 5: Deficit-Focused
Traditional plans: Long lists of problems, needs, barriers, risks. Brief mention of strengths, if any.
What's wrong: Starting from a deficit is demoralising. It positions the person as broken and needing fixing.
Strengths-based plans: Start with what's working, what the person brings, what resources exist. Goals build on strengths, not just address deficits.
What True Collaboration Looks Like
1. Start with Their Vision
Don't start with problems. Start with possibility.
Ask:
"If things were better, what would that look like?"
"What matters most to you right now?"
"What would you like to be different in your life?"
"When you imagine your life in six months or a year, what do you see?"
Let them paint the picture. Don't rush to translate their vision into service-speak.
2. Use Their Words
Take notes while they talk. Then read back: "I heard you say [their exact words]. Is that right?"
When writing goals, use their language:
❌"Client will achieve independent living skills"
✅"I want to be able to cook for myself and have friends over for dinner"
❌"Client will develop emotional regulation strategies"
✅"I want to feel calm enough to enjoy time with my kids"
Their words. Their meaning. Not translated into professional language.
3. Identify What's Already Working
Before jumping to "what needs to change," ask:
"What's already going well?"
"What are you proud of?"
"What's helping you get through right now?"
"Who or what supports you?"
Document strengths, resources, and protective factors first. Then look at what needs to shift.
4. Break Big Goals into Small Steps
"I want to get a job" can feel overwhelming. Break it down together:
Big goal: Employment
Small steps:
Update resume (or create one)
Identify what kind of work I'm interested in
Connect with employment support service
Do one job application
Practice interview skills
Address barriers (transport, anxiety, disclosure)
Make each step specific and achievable. Celebrate each one.
5. Name Barriers Honestly
Don't pretend barriers don't exist. Name them together:
Financial constraints
Transport challenges
Mental health symptoms
Discrimination
Lack of support
Past trauma
System failures
Then: "Given these barriers, what support would help?"
Naming barriers isn't negative—it's realistic. And it shifts focus to what needs to change in the environment, not just in the person.
6. Be Clear About What You Can and Can't Do
Collaborative doesn't mean promising everything.
Be honest: "I can connect you with [service], support you to attend appointments, advocate for [X]. I can't [Y], but I can help you find who can."
Clarity about your role and limits prevents disappointment and builds trust.
7. Make the Plan Accessible to THEM
Ask: "What format would be most useful for you?"
Options:
Written in plain language (no jargon)
Visual/graphic format
Audio recording
Video
Pictures or symbols
Combination
Include:
Their goals in their words
Specific actions with timeframes
Who's responsible for what
How progress will be measured
Emergency contacts and crisis plans
Length: As long as it needs to be—no longer. Some people need detailed plans. Some need one-page summaries.
8. Review and Adjust Regularly
Set review dates: Don't wait for annual reviews. Check in monthly or quarterly.
Ask:
"Is this still what you want?"
"What's changed?"
"What's working? What's not?"
"Do we need to adjust anything?"
Life doesn't stand still. Plans shouldn't either.
Examples: Before and After
Example 1: Mental Health Goal
❌ Traditional (Service-Centred): Goal: Client will attend weekly therapy sessions and demonstrate improved mental health outcomes as measured by PHQ-9 scores.
✅ Collaborative (Person-Centred): What I want: "I want to feel less anxious so I can leave the house without panicking and reconnect with my sister."
Steps we'll take together:
I'll explore therapy options and decide what feels right for me
We'll work on small outings (starting with walking to the corner shop)
I'll practice grounding techniques when I feel panic coming
We'll plan how I might reach out to my sister when I'm ready
Support I need: Someone to come with me on early outings, understanding when I need to cancel, help finding a therapist who gets trauma.
How I'll know it's working: I'll feel more confident leaving the house. I'll have contacted my sister. I'll feel less controlled by anxiety.
Example 2: Housing Goal
❌ Traditional (Worker-Led): Goal: Client will maintain stable housing by attending life skills groups and demonstrating improved budgeting and household management.
✅ Collaborative (Person-Led): What I want: "I want to stay in my unit and feel like it's actually my home, not just somewhere I'm staying."
What's already working: I've kept this place for 6 months (longest ever). I've built a relationship with my neighbour. I love the location.
Challenges: Sometimes I struggle with money and get behind on bills. Place needs repairs the landlord won't do. I don't have much furniture.
Steps:
I'll connect with financial counselling (you'll help me make the appointment)
We'll write to the landlord together about repairs
I'll look into emergency relief for furniture through [organisation]
We'll make a simple budget system that actually works for me
Support I need: Help navigating tenancy issues, backup when dealing with real estate, someone to check in if I'm struggling to ask for help.
How I'll know it's working: I'll feel more secure here. Bills will feel more manageable. The place will feel more like home.
Example 3: Employment Goal
❌ Traditional (Compliance-Focused): Goal: Client will gain employment within 6 months through completion of pre-employment program and active job-seeking activities.
✅ Collaborative (Strength-Based): What I want: "I want to work again. I'm sick of being broke and having nothing to do. I want to feel useful."
What I bring: I've worked before (retail, hospitality). I'm good with people. I'm reliable when I commit to something. I learn fast.
Worries: I'm not sure if I should disclose my disability. I don't know if I can handle full-time. I'm scared of not being good enough.
Steps:
I'll think about what kind of work I actually want (not just what I think I can get)
We'll explore supported employment options
I'll talk to employment consultant about disclosure (and decide what's right for me)
We'll start with volunteer work or part-time to build confidence
I'll work on interview skills at my pace
Support I need: Help finding places that will give me a chance. Someone to practice interviews with. Understanding if it doesn't work out first time.
How I'll know it's working: I'll feel more confident about my skills. I'll have applied for jobs I actually want. Ideally, I'll have found work that feels sustainable.
Collaborative Care Planning with Different People
With Children and Young People
Use their language and interests
Draw or use pictures
Make it fun, not formal
Include their supports (family, friends, teachers)
Focus on school, friends, family, interests—not just problems
Review often (kids' priorities change fast)
With People with Intellectual Disability
Use Easy Read formats
Keep language simple and concrete
Use pictures, symbols, or photos
Check understanding regularly
Include their supporters in ways they want
Make it visual and colourful
With People from Diverse Cultural Backgrounds
Use interpreters where needed
Be aware cultural differences in communication, goal-setting, family involvement
Ask about cultural priorities and values
Don't assume Western individualistic goals fit everyone
Include cultural supports and practices
With People Experiencing Crisis
Keep it simple and immediate
Focus on safety first
Short-term goals that feel achievable
Revisit when crisis has passed
Don't force long-term planning when survival is the priority
When Organisational Templates Don't Fit
Many organisations have mandatory templates. You might not have freedom to completely redesign forms.
What you CAN do:
Complete the template with collaborative information (use their words in the spaces provided)
Create a second version in accessible format for the client
Use the conversation as collaboration, even if the final document looks traditional
Advocate within your organisation for better templates
Remember: Even within constraints, the PROCESS can be collaborative. That matters more than the format.
Barriers to Collaborative Planning
Time pressure: Building collaborative plans takes longer upfront. But they're more likely to be followed and need less revision.
Organisational culture: If your workplace is compliance-driven, truly collaborative planning might be seen as too much.
Your own habits: If you're used to being the expert who tells people what they need, sharing power feels uncomfortable.
Literacy and communication: When people can't read complex plans or communicate verbally, you need creative solutions (not giving up on collaboration).
Power dynamics: Even in "collaborative" processes, you still have power. Acknowledge it and work to share it.
The Heart of It
Collaborative care planning isn't about perfect templates or fancy formats.
It's about:
Believing people are the experts in their own lives
Starting from their vision, not your assessment
Using their words, not professional jargon
Building on strengths, not just addressing deficits
Creating something useful to them, not just to you
Sharing power in the planning process
Committing to ongoing partnership, not one-time documentation
When done well, care plans stop being compliance paperwork and become living tools for change—change the person wants, in directions that matter to them, at a pace that respects their readiness.
That's the difference between planning for someone and planning with someone.
And it makes all the difference.
Key Takeaways
Traditional care planning is often worker-driven, service-centred, and written in jargon the person can't understand
True collaboration starts with the person's vision, uses their words, and builds on strengths
Plans should be accessible in format and language that works for the individual
Living documents require regular review and adjustment as life changes
Collaborative process matters more than perfect templates
Even within organisational constraints, you can make the process more collaborative
Reflection Questions
When you write care plans, whose words are you using—yours or theirs?
What percentage of your care plans focus on service engagement vs. life outcomes?
If your clients read their care plans, would they recognise themselves?
What's one way you could make your next care planning conversation more collaborative?
Further Learning
Transform your care planning practice with The Community Workers Hub:
Collaborative Care Planning with Clients - Co-creating meaningful, person-directed plans
Creative Care Planning: When Standard Forms Fall Short - Alternative formats and approaches
Strengths-Based Planning and Goal-Setting - Building from capacity, not deficit
Join The Hub for practical training that centres on the people you support.
Sarah Smallman is the founder of The Community Workers Hub and has spent her career supporting workers to move from compliance-based to genuinely collaborative practice.

