A small group of people sit together indoors, with one person visibly distressed, holding their head while another gently places a hand on their shoulder in support. Others nearby look on with concern. The black-and-white image conveys emotional distress, care, and the impact of service-related harm. The Community Workers Hub logo appears at the bottom of the image.

When Services Have Caused Harm: Rebuilding Trust

June 18, 202610 min read

When Services Have Caused Harm: Rebuilding Trust

Published: Friday, 19 June 2026
Category: Trauma-Informed Practice
Reading time: 8 minutes


She's been referred to your service. The notes say she's "resistant to engagement," "difficult," and "not ready for help."

But when you meet her, she tells you a different story.

The last caseworker promised help, then ghosted. The one before that shared her information with family members without consent—information that was used against her. A mental health worker dismissed her concerns as "attention-seeking." Child protection used what she disclosed in confidence to justify removal of her children.

She's not resistant to help. She's protecting herself from being hurt again by systems that were supposed to help her.

And she has every reason not to trust you.

This is service-caused harm—also called institutional harm, iatrogenic harm, or systemic trauma. It's the damage done by the very systems and services meant to support people.

And it's devastatingly common.

Let me show you how to recognise it, acknowledge it, and begin repairing it.

What Is Service-Caused Harm?

Service-caused harm happens when helping systems cause damage through:

1. Breaches of Trust

Examples:

  • Information shared without consent

  • Promises broken

  • Confidentiality violated

  • Personal details used against person

Impact: Deep betrayal. Reluctance to disclose anything. Hyper-vigilance about what's documented.

2. Coercion and Control

Examples:

  • Services presented as voluntary but actually compulsory

  • Threatening consequences for non-compliance

  • Removing choice and autonomy

  • Making decisions for people, not with them

Impact: Feeling trapped, powerless, resentful. Resistance to future services.

3. Discrimination and Prejudice

Examples:

  • Racism from workers or systems

  • Ableism in disability services

  • Homophobia or transphobia

  • Class-based judgment

  • Stigma about mental health or substance use

Impact: Shame, anger, mistrust. Avoiding services despite need.

4. Inadequate or Negligent Care

Examples:

  • Not responding to crises

  • Closing cases prematurely

  • Failing to provide promised support

  • Ignoring safety concerns

  • Administrative failures with serious consequences

Impact: Feeling abandoned, unimportant, disposable.

5. Disrespect and Dehumanisation

Examples:

  • Talking about people as if they're not there

  • Patronising or condescending treatment

  • Ignoring people's knowledge about their own lives

  • Treating people as case numbers, not humans

Impact: Degradation, loss of dignity, feeling like an object not a person.

6. Re-traumatization

Examples:

  • Forcing disclosure of trauma before trust is established

  • Invasive questioning

  • Triggering assessments

  • Restraint or seclusion

  • Coercive practices

Impact: Compounding original trauma. Hypervigilance. Avoidance of services.

7. Systemic Failures with Personal Consequences

Examples:

  • Incorrect debt notices causing financial crisis

  • Plan funding cuts without justification

  • Housing applications lost repeatedly

  • Payments suspended without notice

  • Appeals taking years

Impact: Financial hardship, housing instability, health deterioration, loss of trust in all systems.

Recognising Signs of Service-Caused Harm

People who've been harmed by services often:

Present as "Difficult" or "Resistant"

  • Miss appointments

  • Don't engage fully

  • Test boundaries

  • Are hostile or defensive

  • Don't trust easily

This isn't personality. It's protective strategy.

Are Hypervigilant About Documentation

  • Ask what you're writing

  • Refuse to answer certain questions

  • Want to see files

  • Worried about where information goes

This isn't paranoia. It's learned caution.

Have Complex Service Histories

  • Multiple agencies involved

  • Many workers over time

  • Cases closed and reopened

  • Conflicting approaches

This isn't them being "hard to help." It's systems failing them repeatedly.

Express Mistrust Explicitly

"You're just like the others." "Why should I trust you?" "You'll use this against me."

This isn't unfair judgment. It's pattern recognition based on experience.

Show Trauma Responses

  • Dissociation during appointments

  • Shutting down when asked questions

  • Hypervigilance about exits

  • Difficulty trusting

This isn't mental illness. It's response to harm by services.

How Services Cause Harm (Often Unintentionally)

Well-Meaning Workers, Harmful Practices

Examples:

"I have to write this down": Without explaining where it goes or who sees it.

"I'm mandated to report": Used as threat rather than transparent policy.

"You need to engage with support": Framing help as obligation creates coercion.

"I can't help you if you don't...": Making support conditional.

"It's for your own good": Overriding autonomy with paternalism.

Good intentions don't prevent harm.

Organisational Structures That Harm

Rotating workers: Person shares trauma with one worker, then gets reassigned. Repeat forever.

Rigid policies: "Three missed appointments and we close your case." Punishing trauma responses.

Data collection requirements: Invasive questions with no clear purpose or consent.

Interagency information sharing: Details shared across systems without clear consent or benefit.

Systemic Policies That Harm

Mandatory reporting without nuance: Creating fear of disclosure.

Conditional services: "Comply or lose support."

Surveillance and monitoring: Especially in child protection, corrections, mental health.

Restrictive practices: Physical restraint, seclusion, forced medication.

Rebuilding Trust After Service-Caused Harm

Step 1: Acknowledge the Harm

Don't:

  • Defend previous services: "I'm sure they meant well."

  • Minimise: "That was just one bad experience."

  • Dismiss: "You're being oversensitive."

Do:

  • Believe them: "That sounds really harmful. I'm sorry that happened to you."

  • Validate: "You have every reason to be cautious about trusting services."

  • Acknowledge impact: "That would make anyone wary of seeking help again."

You can't rebuild trust without acknowledging why it's broken.

Step 2: Be Radically Transparent

About your role: "My job is to support you with [specific thing]. I don't have any involvement with [child protection/police/etc.]. Here's exactly what I can and can't do."

About documentation: "I'm taking notes so I remember what you've told me. You can see what I'm writing. I'll explain where these notes go and who can access them."

About limitations: "I can help with [X and Y]. I can't help with [Z], but I can connect you with who can."

About mandatory reporting: "I'm required to report if I believe a child is at risk of significant harm. This means [explain clearly]. Everything else you tell me is confidential."

Transparency reduces anxiety and builds trust.

Step 3: Go Slowly

Don't rush:

  • Deep disclosure

  • Trauma history

  • Complex assessments

  • Major decisions

Build slowly:

  • Start with concrete, practical support

  • Let them lead the pace

  • Earn trust through consistency

  • Demonstrate trustworthiness before asking for vulnerability

Example: Don't: "Tell me about your trauma history in our first meeting." Do: "Let's start with what you need right now. We can talk about history when you're ready."

Step 4: Give Control Back

Offer choices wherever possible:

  • Where you meet

  • What you talk about

  • Whether they want to answer questions

  • How frequently you connect

  • Who else is involved

Even small choices rebuild sense of agency.

Ask permission: "Can I ask about [topic]?" "Is it okay if I take notes?" "Would it help if I contacted [service]?"

Permission-asking signals respect for autonomy.

Step 5: Deliver on Promises

If you say you'll do something, do it.

  • Call when you say you will

  • Follow up on what you promised

  • Show up to appointments

  • Deliver what you commit to

Reliability is the foundation of trust.

If you can't deliver:

  • Say so upfront: "I can't guarantee that, but I can try."

  • Explain why: "I tried to get [X], but [reason]. Here's what I can do instead."

  • Apologise: "I said I'd do this and I couldn't. I'm sorry."

Honesty about failures builds trust more than false promises.

Step 6: Respond to Testing Behaviour

People who've been harmed often test new workers:

  • Miss appointment to see if you'll reject them

  • Push boundaries to see your response

  • Share something difficult to gauge your reaction

  • Are hostile to see if you'll retaliate

This isn't manipulation. It's assessment.

Pass the test by:

  • Staying calm and non-judgmental

  • Maintaining boundaries without rejection

  • Being consistent

  • Not taking it personally

  • Showing up anyway

Example: They miss three appointments without calling.

Harmful response: "We're closing your case. You're not engaging."

Trauma-informed response: "I noticed you missed appointments. That's okay—sometimes life gets in the way. Would you like to reschedule? If appointments don't work, we could try something different like text check-ins."

Step 7: Repair Ruptures

When trust breaks down:

  • Acknowledge it immediately: "I think I messed up yesterday. Can we talk about it?"

  • Apologise sincerely: "I'm sorry. That wasn't okay."

  • Take responsibility: "This is on me, not on you."

  • Ask what would help: "What would make this right?"

  • Change behaviour: Show with actions, not just words

Repair is more important than never making mistakes.

Step 8: Create Safety

Physical safety:

  • Meet in places they feel safe

  • Respect personal space

  • Let them sit near exits

  • No sudden movements or loud voices

Emotional safety:

  • No judgment

  • No pressure to disclose

  • Respect for boundaries

  • Belief when they share

Relational safety:

  • Consistency

  • Predictability

  • Follow-through

  • Respect

Safety must be felt, not just offered.

Step 9: Advocate for Them, Not Just Within Systems

When services have harmed someone:

  • Challenge the harm: "That shouldn't have happened."

  • Support complaints if they want

  • Connect to advocacy organisations

  • Document patterns of harm

  • Use your voice to prevent future harm

Don't stay silent about harmful practices.

Step 10: Know Your Limits

You can't fix harm done by others.

Your role is:

  • Not causing more harm

  • Being trustworthy in this relationship

  • Supporting their healing

  • Advocating for better systems

Your role is NOT:

  • Apologising for all past services

  • Fixing all trust issues

  • Making them trust you

  • Healing all trauma

Be realistic about what you can offer.

When You or Your Service Causes Harm

You will cause harm. We all do, despite best intentions.

When it happens:

1. Acknowledge It

"I realise what I said/did was harmful. I'm sorry."

Don't defend. Don't explain why you meant well. Just acknowledge impact.

2. Listen Without Defensiveness

They might be angry. That's valid.

Your job is to hear them, not manage your own discomfort.

3. Take Responsibility

"This is on me. I should have [done differently]."

Not: "You misunderstood." Not: "I didn't mean it that way."

4. Ask What Repair Looks Like

"What would help make this right?"

They might not know. That's okay. The asking matters.

5. Change Your Practice

Show through actions that you've heard and learned.

6. Use Supervision

Process your feelings with supervisor, not with the person you harmed.

Organisational harm requires an organisational response:

  • Policy changes

  • Staff training

  • Complaints processes that work

  • Accountability mechanisms

Individual apologies aren't enough for systemic harm.

Preventing Service-Caused Harm

Individual level:

  • Practice trauma-informed care

  • Respect autonomy

  • Be transparent

  • Keep promises

  • Don't overpromise

  • Document respectfully

  • Maintain boundaries ethically

  • Repair ruptures

Organisational level:

  • Train all staff in trauma-informed practice

  • Review policies for harmful practices

  • Create genuine complaints processes

  • Support workers to practice ethically

  • Adequate resourcing (prevents harm from overwhelm)

  • Supervision and debriefing

  • Learn from complaints

Systemic level:

  • Advocate for policy changes

  • Document patterns of harm

  • Support sector-wide reforms

  • Challenge coercive practices

  • Join campaigns for change

The Bigger Picture

Service-caused harm is not rare. It's routine.

Child protection removals that didn't need to happen. Mental health detentions that were traumatic. Disability services that controlled rather than supported. Homelessness services that warehoused people. Case management that made people feel like problems to solve.

We can't undo harm others have caused.

But we can:

  • Not cause more harm

  • Be trustworthy in our relationships

  • Acknowledge when harm happens

  • Advocate for better systems

  • Support healing where we can

Every person who accesses services deserves to be helped, not harmed.

That starts with us.


Key Takeaways

  • Service-caused harm includes breaches of trust, coercion, discrimination, negligence, and re-traumatisation

  • People labelled "resistant" or "difficult" are often protecting themselves from repeated harm

  • Rebuilding trust requires acknowledging harm, radical transparency, going slowly, and giving control back

  • Testing behaviour is assessment of safety, not manipulation—pass the test through consistency

  • Repair ruptures immediately when they happen

  • You can't fix harm others caused, but you can be trustworthy in this relationship

  • Prevention requires trauma-informed practice at individual, organisational, and systemic levels


Reflection Questions

  • How might service-caused harm show up in people you support?

  • When have you or your service unintentionally caused harm? What did you learn?

  • What could change in your practice to prevent harm?

  • What organisational or systemic changes would reduce service-caused harm?


Further Learning

Deepen trauma-informed practice with The Community Workers Hub:

  • Trauma-Informed Approaches in Community Work - Understanding and responding to trauma

  • Building Safety and Trust in Service Relationships - Creating trustworthy relationships

  • When Services Fail: Repairing Harm and Rebuilding Trust - Specific strategies for service-caused harm

Join The Hub for training that centres on healing, not harm.


Sarah Smallman is the founder of The Community Workers Hub and believes we must face the harm services cause honestly—and commit to doing better.

Sarah Smallman

Sarah Smallman

Hi, I’m Sarah – and I’m passionate about supporting the people who support communities. With over 20 years of experience in the community services sector, I’ve walked alongside individuals, families, and organisations through some of the most complex and challenging situations. My background spans frontline service delivery, case management, policy advocacy, training, and leadership — giving me a deep understanding of the real-world pressures community workers face, and the practical tools that can help. I’ve worked with diverse communities, including women with disabilities, First Nations peoples, people navigating complex trauma, and families living with rare genetic conditions.

LinkedIn logo icon
Instagram logo icon
Back to Blog

View our Privacy Policy and Terms and Conditions here.

© . All Rights Reserved.